Welcome to the Forum

"Law and Economics"

Participation in this forum has to comply with a few rules:

  • Contributions which do not deal with topics like "economics analysis of law" or "economic policy" will be deleted.
  • You do not have to register with forum romanum.
  • For a registration, you need a working Email address.
  • No one has a right that his contribution will be (or remains) posted.
  • The ForumMaster reserves the right to delete contributions at his own discretion.
  • All contributions reflect only the personal opinion of their author.
  • If you participate, you implicitly declare that you agree with these rules.
| Forum | Search | Members | Home  
» Welcome, Guest [ Login | Register


RE: Reliance Damages


Forum
- Law and Economics



  Create answer | Email this Article | Back to Forum
by Kirstein on 27 Jul. 2008 11:45

Correct, the compensation is p+i. But that‘s not what is calculated in the upper part of slide 72. Here I look at the investment and the return on this investment. In the example, an additional investment of 24 (total investment amounts to 34) brings an additional return of 30 if B receives the item in the end.

In case of breach, he receives an additional compensation of 24 (without the additooanl investement, he receives p+10, and with the investment he receives p+34; the difference is 24).

Best
RK

Web search, Forum search for Reliance Damages

Replies
  • Reliance Damages (Anonym | 25 Jul. 2008 17:42)
    • RE: Reliance Damages (Kirstein * | 27 Jul. 2008 11:45)




Privacy Policy | Get your own free Forum, Blogs and Website at ForumRomanum